Biopsia de próstata transrrectal bajo guía ecográfica y fusión con resonancia magnética: experiencia inicial en pacientes con biopsia previa negativa / Transrectal Prostate Biopsy under Ultrasound Guidance and Magnetic Resonance Fusion: Intial Experience in Patients with Negative Previous Biopsy

Objetivos: Analizar la performance diagnóstica de la punción biopsia prostática (PBP) guiada mediante ecografía con fusión de imágenes de resonancia magnética (RM) para la detección del cáncer de próstata (CP) en pacientes con biopsia previa negativa. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron todas las PBP transrrectales dirigidas bajo ecografía con fusión de imágenes de RM en pacientes mayores de 40 años de edad con sospecha de CP y biopsia previa randomizada negativa efectuadas durante el período comprendido entre enero de 2015 y enero de 2018. Se calculó la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo de dicho procedimiento. Resultados: De un total de 40 pacientes, 25 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. La PBP transrrectal guiada bajo ecografía con fusión de imágenes de RM presentó una sensibilidad del 90% en la detección de CP clínicamente significativo (CPsig), mostrando una mejoría en la detección del 20% respecto de la biopsia randomizada. Conclusiones: La PBP transrrectal guiada con ecografía y fusión de imágenes de RM mejora la performance en la detección de CPsig en pacientes con biopsia previa negativa(AU)

Objective: To analyze the diagnostic performance of transrectal prostate US (ultrasonography) guided biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with negative previous biopsy. Materials and methods: Between January 2015 to January 2018, transrectal prostate biopsies under US guided with MRI fusion were performed in patients older than 40 years with suspicion of prostate cancer and prior negative biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the procedure were analyzed. Results: Out of a total of 40 patients, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Transrectal prostate US guided biopsy with MRI fusion presented a sensitivity of 90%, showing an improvement of 20% in the clinically significant prostate cancer detection compared with randomized biopsy. Conclusions: Transrectal prostate US guided biopsy with MRI fusion showed high performance in the detection of significative prostate cancer in patients with negative previous biopsy(AU)

Applications for a hybrid operating room in thoracic surgery: from multidisciplinary procedures to ­­image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery / Usos da sala híbrida em cirurgia torácica: de procedimentos multidisciplinares à cirurgia toracoscópica videoassistida guiada por imagem

ABSTRACT The concept of a hybrid operating room represents the union of a high-complexity surgical apparatus with state-of-the-art radiological tools (ultrasound, CT, fluoroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging), in order to perform highly effective, minimally invasive procedures. Although the use of a hybrid operating room is well established in specialties such as neurosurgery and cardiovascular surgery, it has rarely been explored in thoracic surgery. Our objective was to discuss the possible applications of this technology in thoracic surgery, through the reporting of three cases.

RESUMO O conceito de sala híbrida traduz a união de um aparato cirúrgico de alta complexidade com recursos radiológicos de última geração (ultrassom, TC, radioscopia e/ou ressonância magnética), visando a realização de procedimentos minimamente invasivos e altamente eficazes. Apesar de bem estabelecido em outras especialidades, como neurocirurgia e cirurgia cardiovascular, o uso da sala hibrida ainda é pouco explorado na cirurgia torácica. Nosso objetivo foi discutir as aplicações e as possibilidades abertas por essa tecnologia na cirurgia torácica através do relato de três casos.

Using an abdominal phantom to teach urology residents ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle placement

ABSTRACT Introduction: To assess the effect of a hands-on ultrasound training session to teach urologic trainees ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle placement. Materials and methods: University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) urology residents completed a time trial, placing a needle into a phantom model target under ultrasound guidance. Participants were randomized into three educational exposure groups: Group 1's time trial occurred prior to any teaching intervention, group 2's after experiencing a hands-on training module, and group 3's after exposure to both the training module and one-on-one attending feedback. Needle placement speed and accuracy as well as trainees' perceived confidence in utilizing ultrasound were measured. Results: The study cohort consisted of 15 resident trainees. Seven were randomized to group 1, three to group 2, and five to group 3. All residents reported minimal prior ultrasound experience. Their confidence in using ultrasound improved significantly after completing the training module with the most significant improvement seen among junior residents. Time to needle placement was fastest after receiving attending feedback (46.6sec in group 3 vs. 82.7sec in groups 1 and 2, p<0.01). Accuracy also improved with attending feedback, though the number of repositioning attempts did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: A hands-on training module and use of an abdominal phantom trainer increased resident confidence and skill in their use of ultrasound to guide percutaneous needle positioning. Attending feedback is critical for improving accuracy in needle guidance toward a target. Ultrasound-guided needle positioning is a teachable skill and can be applicable to multiple urologic procedures.

What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of 10-, 12-, and 16-core prostate biopsies for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and correlated the results with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volumes, Gleason scores, and detection rates of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective controlled study was conducted in 354 consecutive patients with various indications for prostate biopsy. Sixteen-core biopsy specimens were obtained from 351 patients. The first 10-core biopsy specimens were obtained bilaterally from the base, middle third, apex, medial, and latero-lateral regions. Afterward, six additional punctures were performed bilaterally in the areas more lateral to the base, middle third, and apex regions, yielding a total of 16-core biopsy specimens. The detection rate of carcinoma in the initial 10-core specimens was compared with that in the 12- and 16-core specimens. RESULTS: No significant differences in the cancer detection rate were found between the three biopsy protocols. PCa was found in 102 patients (29.06%) using the 10-core protocol, in 99 patients (28.21%) using the 12-core protocol, and in 107 patients (30.48%) using the 16-core protocol (p=0.798). The 10-, 12-, and 16-core protocols were compared with stratified PSA levels, stratified prostate volumes, Gleason scores, and detection rates of HGPIN and ASAP; no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer positivity with the 10-core protocol was not significantly different from that with the 12- and 16-core protocols, which indicates that the 10-core protocol is acceptable for performing a first biopsy.